Case analysis Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Analysis - Case Study Example As of now, at the second level, no forms of registration limitations exist for .co domains, which take their parent entity from go.co. What this means is that any individual or company at all can get registered unto a .co domain. Internet and website pundits such as Alexa classify go.co to generally fall under web portals (Management Study Guide, 2012). For the purpose of the present case study therefore, the company, Go.co will be analyzed as a separate and independent company from the ccTLD category but pushed into the wider web portal category as key competitors seem to be springing up quickly on a daily basis in that broader industry scope as a web portal. Industry Analysis Major International Competitors .com Countries: USA, Argentina, Mexico, Brazil, Italy, Romania Type of Company: Common Stock 30 Day Average Volume: 3,607,911 Domain Name System Security Extensions (DNSSEC): Yes Yahoo Country: Germany, Japan, USA, Mexico, Italy Type of Company: Common Stock and ADR 30 Day Avera ge Volume: 23,252,490 DNSSEC: Yes AOL Countries: Germany, USA Type of Company: Common Stock Shares outstanding: 93.97 DNSSEC: No Baidu Country: Singapore, Germany, Mexico, USA Type of Company: Common Stock 30 Day average Volume: 4,581,215 DNSSEC: No .uk Country: UK, Germany Type of Company: Common Stock Shares outstanding: 2.32 DNSSEC: Yes GO.CO Country: France Type of Company: Common Stock Shares outstanding: 1.34 DNSSEC: Yes Xing Countries: Germany, UK Type of Company: Common Stock 30 Day Average Volume: 548 DNSSEC: No Source: Bloomberg (2012) GO.CO is comfortably treated as part of the web portal competitive industry because of the line of business and area of web operation under taken by .CO and the other web portals. In a typical scenario, almost all of these companies provide search engine and online sale services and so can all come under the same umbrella in a comfortable manner (Quick, 2009). From the table, there are two major competitors identified for go.com if the compa ny wants to position itself at a point where it would gain its accolade as an international force in the web portal industry. These companies or competitors are .com and .uk. Already, .com is ranked as the number most popular internet TLD by Alexa, whiles the same source ranks .uk as number two (Roberts, 2009). From the table, which presents the 30 Day Average Volume and shares outstanding, not much can be said to refute this fact. Strategic Analysis Models SWOT Analysis Strengths A globally strong parent company, GO.CO and other major TLD, which is the .com domain. Multi-operational web system and function Reduced capital intensive growth path as a result of existing franchise model Brand equity, which creates a competitive edge. Weaknesses Inability to rise as a third force in the global web portal industry Over dependence on franchise ownership by other subsidiaries of its parent company Static innovative growth to match modern trends of web browsing. Opportunities Ever growing n eed among internet users for search engines and other web portals Ever growing population of internet users (Quick, 2009) Growing affordability of companies to promote internet use (Vancouver, 2006) Threats Rapid growth of smaller competitors such as AOL and Xing as competitive web portals. Global economic rebasing (Garderner, 2006) Larger competitors entering into further alliances for growth. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis Intensity of Competitive Rivalry Very High The revenue turnover of the key competitor namely Yahoo, and that of the

Human rights law All Human rights are universal, indivisible and Essay

Human rights law All Human rights are universal, indivisible and interdependent and interrelated. the international community m - Essay Example The United Nations through its charter on human rights seeks to protect the laws that guards and binds the protection and freedom of every human with dignity and individual respect for all, being the hallmark of such laws. We are individuals who live and operate by certain national or international legal order, whether we are Americans, Nigerians, Chinese or British, we possess, to varying degrees which depends on the State within which we exist, rights. These rights, such as the right to existence, and the freedom of speech, right to marriage, freedom from arbitrary detention or the right to free expression oneself, are almost always incorporated into the national Constitutions and legislative Acts of nations. The to which these rights are respected and the preferences of certain these rights over others, largely depends on the nature of the national legal system within which we evolve and develop and operate, thus, regardless of the fact that we live in a democratic, a monarchical or on the other extreme; a repressive and authoritarian State, human rights should always be respected. But many events over the past decades of human existence, has proved that such rights that ought to be respected in most cases, are not. Certain individuals or group of individuals have had their freedom trampled upon by stronger forces within the nucleus of the same or an external society. Many laws meant to discriminate against certain people from certain regional or ethnic locations have being propounded and executed by ruthless states as a means of silencing oppositions. For instance the Grand Holocaust in Germany, carried out by the ruthless Nazi, under the leadership of Adolf Hitler, the Rwandan Genocide of 1994, the Iraqi Genocides against the Kurds, the genocide in Bosnia Herzegovina and the Cambodian Genocides, are all acts that openly violated human rights of individuals and peoples of a particular nationality/ethnicity. Other inhuman actions like the imprisonment of Nel son Mandela of South Africa, the Apartheid, Slavery in Africa, the invasion of Kuwait by Iraq, the exploitation of sovereign states by the USA and its Western allied, the house arrest of ASSK of Burma etc. are all examples that portray how nations and peoples (stronger elements in society) can trample upon the human rights of weaker elements in society. Some of this atrocities and infringement on the rights of others were carried out internally within a state, while others were carried out by external states or individuals against the people of another society. The big question here is what can individuals do if their rights provided under their national laws are not respected, or if national laws do not safeguard their fundamental human rights at all. Is there an international forum where individuals can turn to and file a complaint against that State? Or against another state? Depending upon the situation at hand? Beginning from the year 1945, the United Nations became active in f ormulating and implementing policies that will ensure the protection of human rights of every human being all over the world. They have set up many instruments for protecting Human Rights after 1945. Article 1 of 1948 UN Charter states that2 â€Å"